Groenendijk stokhof dissertation

1this tripartite classification has its source in groenendijk and stokhof (1984b) and berman (1991) it is good to who came 15groenendijk and stokhof ( 1984b) argue that the propositional concept semantics is also needed for questions doctoral dissertation, university of amsterdam guerzoni. Centre, amsterdam, 1981) engdahl, e, the syntax and semantics of questions in swedish (doctoral dissertation, amherst, 1980) gallin, d, intensional and higher-order modal logic (north- holland, amsterdam 1975) gazdar, g, pragmatics (academic press, new york, 1979) groenendijk, j and m stokhof, ' infinitives. Kyoto university, september 20, 2009 1 background • by 1997, the study of questions had become a vast area of research the paper is written with lots of hindsight • groenendijk and stokhof (gs) did major work in the area in their dissertation groenendijk and stokhof (1984) and other papers published around that time. This dissertation provides evidence that the notion of maximality plays a central role in the semantics of in chapters 2, 3, and 4 of this dissertation i will investigate the semantics of the constructions mentioned above under the rubric of strong exhaustiveness (groenendijk and stokhof (1982)) in chapter 4, i discuss a.

20 märz 2006 engdahl, e 1980 the syntax and semantics of questions in swedish, university of massachusetts, amherst: doctoral dissertation engdahl, e 1986 constituent questions the syntax and semantics of questions with special reference to swedish dordrecht: reidel groenendijk, j, and stokhof, m 1982. (eg veltman 1996 groenendijk & stokhof 1991) but what if we doubt the importance of these results william starr | conditionals, meaning and mood: dissertation defense | rutgers university 17/46 meaning conditionals mood references informational dynamic semantics what's the point question. Carlson, greg, 1977a: reference to kinds in english, phd dissertation, university of massachusetts, amherst of quantifying expressions in french, dutch and english, phd dissertation, leiden university university, ca groenendijk, jeroen and stokhof, martin 1982: semantic analysis of wh-complements linguistics. Martin stokhof (born 1950, amsterdam) is a dutch logician and philosopher stokhof wrote a joint phd dissertation with jeroen groenendijk on the semantics of questions, under the supervision of renate bartsch and johan van benthem he was also an important figure in the development of dynamic semantics ( together.

In inquisitive semantics introduction • groenendijk & stokhof ( ) provided a theory of questions that improved in several re- studied exibility amsterdam, netherlands: university of amsterdam dissertation higginbotham, james the semantics of questions in shalom lappin (ed), handbook of contemporary semantic. Veridicality and interpretation spector & egré's (2015) formalization when a q- agnostic predicate takes a question q, it relates an attitude holder to some possible (complete) answer to q (cf hamblin 1973, groenendijk & stokhof 1984, beck & rullmann 1999, lahiri 2002) 18. Building on groenendijk & stokhof's (1984) joint dissertation, schulz & van rooij (2006) and spector (2006) study an “exhaustivity operator” that allows them to replicate a certain range of quantity implicatures to explain, consider the following example inspector ambrose, who is investigating a.

At this point, i would like to add to the mix some work on exhaustivity that has not been taken into account in the recent literature on conditional perfection groenendijk & stokhof in their dissertation (1984) show that in the normal case unadorned answers to questions are interpreted as supplying an exhaustive answer to the. First of all i would like to thank the members of my dissertation committee, who kept faith in me despite slow this dissertation provides evidence that the notion of maximality plays a central role in the semantics of under the rubric of strong exhaustiveness (groenendijk and stokhof (1982)) in chapter 4, i discuss a. Groenendijk, j, & stokhof, m (1984) studies in the semantics of questions and the pragmatics of answers (unpublished doctoral dissertation) university of amsterdam [google scholar] hamblin, c l (1973) questions in montague english foundations of language, 10, 41–53 [web of science ®.

Doctoral dissertation university of amsterdam 1986: towards a theory of information the status of partial objects in semantics supervisors: renate bartsch and frank veltman published as: see fred landman, 1987, 'groups, plural individuals and intentionality,' in: j groenendijk, m stokhof and f veltman (eds). A few answers have noted that phd theses with two authors do exist, and that is interesting trivia however, i think it is useful to however, the only example i know of is this thesis from linguistics: 123669 (groenendijk & stokhof 1984) whether it is possible in the.

Groenendijk stokhof dissertation

Dear jeroen, martin and frank, we are delighted to present this collection of essays to you, written by many friends and colleagues of yours we hope that they will take you on a joyful ride through the history of our field, in which you played such a vital role, and that they will also offer some inspiring thoughts and new. 7see sloman (1970) jackson (1985) finlay (2009, ms) finlay and snedegar (fc ) cariani (2009, fc) snedegar (2012) kierland (ms) 8see hamblin (1958) groenendijk and stokhof (1997) higginbotham (1993, 1996) for this sort of view of questions 9see schaffer (2007) stanley (2011) ascriptions that explicitly include. Irene heim - 1982 - dissertation, umass amherst a theory of truth and semantic representation, 277-322, jag groenendijk, tmv janssen and mbj stokhof, edsh kamp - 1981 - in jeroen groenendijk (ed), formal methods in the study of language u of amsterdam modal subordination and pronominal anaphora in.

  • Dissertation, university of reading (1976) grice, 1976 hp gricelogic and conversation p cole, j morgan (eds), syntax and semantics, speech acts, vol iii, academic press, new york (1976) groenendijk and stokhof, 1975 jeroen groenendijk, martin stokhofmodality and conversational information theoretical.
  • Groenendijk and stokhof (1982, 1984) criticize karttunen's semantics of questions because of the kinds of inferences it groenendijk and stokhof take the de dicto reading to be the basic meaning of the question, and we will doctoral dissertation, university of massachusetts at amherst cresti, diana ( 1995): extraction.
  • Answer is the second cell in the partition and so one in this dissertation, i do not use groenendijk and stokhof's (1984) proposal but instead adopt the other mainstream approach to question semantics, the hamblin/karttunen ap- proach ( hamblin, 1973 karttunen, 1977) under this approach, questions.

Groenendijk & stokhof label the characteristic of karttunen's ques- tion semantics weakly exhaustive, as compared to the strongly exhaustive nature of our acta philosophica fennica 28(4) amsterdam: north-holland hirschbuhler, p (1978) the syntax and semantics of wh-constructions phd dissertation umass. I argue that both types of argument wh questions in swedish, clefted and non clefted, give rise to the same kind of pragmatic implication and that the choice between clefted and non clefted form does not depend on a difference in semantic content, butis, inmostcases. To provide the core framework i will build on throughout the dissertation • to fix notation an immediate extension of the analysis of adverbs of quantification in groenendijk & stokhof (1991): 81- 82 in terms of the (ie the one in groenendijk & stokhof (1991)) is that of classical first-order logic with identity however, in. Your use of the jstor archive indicates your acceptance of jstor's terms and conditions of use, available at termsjsp jstor's terms and conditions of use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal.

groenendijk stokhof dissertation The second notion of answerhood is proven to be equivalent to groenendijk and stokhof's interrogative semantics on the basis of a wide range of empirical data showing that questions often are not interpreted exhaustively, it is argued that a fairly rich system of semantic objects associated with questions is needed to. groenendijk stokhof dissertation The second notion of answerhood is proven to be equivalent to groenendijk and stokhof's interrogative semantics on the basis of a wide range of empirical data showing that questions often are not interpreted exhaustively, it is argued that a fairly rich system of semantic objects associated with questions is needed to.
Groenendijk stokhof dissertation
Rated 4/5 based on 18 review